PAUNCH
NUMBER 53-54 (January, 1980)
ROOT METAPHOR: THE LIVE THOUGHT OF STEPHEN
C. PEPPER
Edited by Arthur Efron and John
Herold
frontispiece: from Hiroshige's Tokaido
series, The Shono Station
Acknowledgments
Arthur Efron
Introduction: Pepper's Continuing
Value
Stephen C. Pepper
Metaphor in Philosophy
Elmer H. Duncan
The Philosophy of Stephen C. Pepper: An Appraisal.
Lewis E. Hahn
The Stephen C. Pepper Papers, 1903-1972.
Charles Hartshorne
Pepper's Approach to Metaphysics
Joseph H. Monast
Reply to Hartshorne
Amy Rosen
Multicolored Reactions to Pepper's Modern Color
Stephen C. Pepper
Aesthetic Quality
John Herold
Pepper's Analysis of the "Work of Art",
Radical Implications
John M. Hill
Pepper's Contextualism and the Reader's Values
John Herold
Feeling Tess's Pain: Response to John Hill
Barry K. Grant
Prolegomena to a Contextualistic Genre Criticism
David B. Richardson
Stephen Pepper's Formist Light on G. E.
Moore
Brian Caraher
Telescoping Sense: Conflicting Root Metaphors
in Frege's Theory of Meaning
Robert J. Yanal
Pepper on Definitions and Aesthetics
Robert L. Armstrong
Pepper on Truth and Beauty: A Comment on Yanal
James Quina and Lin Alessio
World Hypotheses as Methods for Teaching Humanities
in the Secondary Schools
Elmer H. Duncan & Arthur Efron
Stephen C. Pepper: Additions to a Bibliography
Robert L. Armstrong
A Personal and Philosophical Memoir of Stephen C. Pepper
Wallace I. Matson
Memoir
Contributors
The Editor's Hand
PAUNCH, edited by Arthur Efron,
The Department of English, State University of New York at Buffalo, is
no longer published on a regular basis. Address all inquiries to Arthur
Efron, 123 Woodward Ave., Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA. The described concerns
of the magazine varied slightly over the years from the mid-60s to the
mid-90s but the following is fairly representative and is taken from the
January, 1980 issue: The concerns of the magazine, insofar as they can
be predicted, will be (1) the body in literature; (2) problems of aesthetics,
particularly in relation to Dewey’s Art as Experience and Pepper’s
The Basis of Criticism in the Arts; (3) literature in relation to
the authority – and criminality – of the modern state; (4) reviews. And,
some poems.